|
Biblic flooding and possible astriod impact.
|
- Was there a
collision of the Earth with an astriod or comet?.
- Is the crater at the
Charleston coast (+/- 500 by +/- 700 Kms) a result of this
collision?.
- Signs of impact at
Charleston coastline.
- Possible orbits for
the astriod or comet heurting the Earth.
- Did the blilic
flooding ever exist.
- If the flooding
existed, where did the water came from, and where did it go
afterwards?.
- If the flooding rain
came from the Atlantic ocean, where did the evaporation energie come
from?.
- Plato mentioned a
flooding to, however according to Plato's dialogs people living in
the mountains survived.
- Does the loess,
going from French coast upto China come from this possible
cataclismic event?.
Possible astriod orbits passing to close to the Earth orbit.
|
Illustration
of some astriod orbits crossing the Earth orbit or passing more or
less regulary nearby the Earth orbit.
Then most astriods
do have very eccentric orbits, then the original article from Otto
H. Muck suggested
that the cataclysm could have been caused by a compagnion of one
of the following today known astriods: Eros (discovered in 1898),
Alinda (1918), Ganymède (1924),
Amor (1932, Apollo (1934), Adonis
(1936) , Hermès (1937).
Then a destabilized
orbit of a celestial object caused by a Big Planet (Jupiter Saturn
Uranus and Nepune) line-up could very well cause a collision in a
worst case condition to have happened.
(Yes
worst case conditions
do happen, even then when you dont want
them, and you dont expect them, like Nuclear Powerplant accidents,
or like the runway accident involving two jumbojets with over (500
people killed)
Then a worst case
condition would be the following, near to complete lingup of the
planets Jupiter Saturn Uranus and Nepune
on the other side of the Sun, and on our side side of the Sun,
Venus Moon and finaly the Earth, adding up all gravity
forces and ease up by this the capture of an celestical object comming
a little to close to the Earth orbit. All
this together with one or the other Astriod or group of Astriods,
or even a comet passing a little to close to the Earth orbit, will
cause a colision to happen due to the object being captured by
this added up gravity of the Earth and the other planets.
Sorry for the people
doing astrology, but I did not include Mercury nor Mars because
they will not make much differenceif any. Mercury because to close to
the Sun and the mass relationship Sun - Mercury renders the effect
totaly nill. And Mars because of its Mass - Distance2
relationship, it's of to little mass and to far away to make any
notable difference anyway.
|
|
This
immage illustrates some of the possible orbits, of how an object
can be captured by the added up gravity of the Earth and the other
planets and causing a collision with the Earth.
The red - yellow
orbit illustrates an astriod or comet orbit causing the impact to
slow down the rotation speed of the Earth and is therefore in
opposite direction to the Earth rotation.
The blue - green orbit
illustrates an astriod or comet orbit causing the impact to
accelerate the rotation speed of the Earth and is therefore in the
same direction as the Earth rotation.
In fact both orbits
could have caused both conditions, but this picture is just for
illustration how a collision could have happened. The
red - yellow will more likely hit the Earth at daytime and the
blue - green orbit will more likely hit the Earth at night time.
|
The Charleston Coastline & Bermuda Triangle
|

|
A place for a
possible astriod or comet impact is illustrated by this image.
Then this image illustrates a field around the
North American town Charleston of today completely paet filled
craters, all a result of an collission with a meteor, astriod or
even a comet.
The craters form a
field of an eliptical form which looks like to continue over the
coastline into the ocean like as presented here by a dotted line.
|
|

|
This immage
illustrates important seimic activities around the Charleston
zone, who could indicate than the Earth crust has been altered or
damaged at this point.
One should note
that nomally there should not be any tectonic plate movement at
this erea, then those are at least 1000 Kms further south, so the
second raison for this seismic activity could be that the Earth
crust has been badly damaged by a cataclysm, and did not
completely stabilize since then.
|
|

|
Image of the crater
outside the Charleston coastline obtained by coloring altitude and
ocean floor level date in a very special way, such that we get a
sort of 3D effect to render the Atlantic ocean floor profile
clearly visible.
This crater looks
to be about 500 Kms by 700 Kms, and corresponds perfectly to an
object size of 50 Km to 66 Km, than an impact crater is usualy 10
times the object size.
Anyway do not try
to find any trace of an object here, then an object of that size
going at 30 Km / sec just makes a big hole and contignues his way
like bullet, and will enter very far the Earth going towards the
cernter of the Earth until it completely stopped.
|
|
A side effect of
having an impact in a depth of over 4'000 meters is that at pressure
of over 400 bars, even water will stay liquid whatever the
termperature is (this is
usually called the critical pressure of a liquid or gas),
and that volcanic gazes stay liquid to for the same raison, and this
due to the pressure being over the critical pressure (That is a
pressure where gazes can no longer exist in gazious form, and will
stay liquid or even solid), and that most of the volcanic gazes
are in liquid state heavier as water and will as such stay, or end up
on the ocean floor instead of making it up to the ocean surface.
Then such an impact on
a continent would have wiped out live for some million years, because
the object would have exploded and the freeing up the total it's
kenetical energie of the impact in the air would have
had the same or
even worst effect as a Thermonuclear War. As
this was the case whith the astriod collission causing the
dissapearing of the dinosaures 65'000'000 years ago. In
our case, the water must have filtered 99% of all the volcanic dirt
and dust, and did as well absorb near the total of all the kenetic
energie of the impact, then de density of 5'000 meters of water if
many - many times then the density of the air the object had to travel trough.
Therefore an impact in the sea at a depth over 4'000
meters avoids the above mentioned stuf to
make its way to the surface and
to the upper atmosphere and stratosphere, and leaving us
today with an raisonable climat.
An other side effect
of an celestical object ripping up the ocean floor is that the heat
of magma of over 1'200 °C in contact with water in a depth of
over 4'000 meters will cause the water to be heated up and initiate a
cicular mouvement, (the same happens during cooking) and transfering by doing so
the heat of the magma to the surrounding environment (ocean
water is heated up).
One side effect of
this cicular mouvement is that the liquified or even solidified
gazes, (note that at 400 bars most gazes stay liqiud)
and most of the volcanic dust and dirt does not make it up to
the surface and follows this cicular
mouvement, drops afterwards somewere on the ocean floor where they still
should be found as of today. Thereby we may expect
to find solidified gazes and volcanic remains about everywere on the
North Atlantic ocean floor, and this besides any debris of the
accompagnion volcanic erruptions, caused by the chockwave of the
impact.
An other side effect of the
the warming up of the oceans warter is that this causes an significant increase of
avaporation wich in turn will cause very havy rain on the continents.
This again may explain all the flooding stories and may render
the flooding within the possibilities.
|
Is flooding possible?, if yes how.
|
The first possibility
is 1. It never happened (Some
scientists pretend that it never could have happened), the
second is 2. The whole world is flooded
(Bible pretends it),
the third possibility is in the midle of both is 3.
A part of the world is more or less flooded. (Plato's
dialogs who wrote: « the
survivors in your country are herdsmen and shepherds who dwell on the
mountains »).
How it happend?, again
both Bible and Plato tell us that this flooding was due to exessive
rain, and not a result of an innundation (Plato who wrote: « a
single night of excessive rain »). First
of all because there is not enough water on the Earth to innundate
the whole world, not even with rain, so we can consider that at
biblic time the people had a wrong image of the world (see picture
below), or the whole event looked to them worst as was in reality,
then when one sees nothing but water around him asq the result of
exessive rain, then he may tend to think that the whole world must
look like this.
This hovever rises a
question, rain requires the water to be evaporated first and this
evaporation process requires in trun a lot of energie in the form of
heat, which could not have been dilivered by sunshine and must have
come from somewhere else. The added up heat of all
the magma being in contact with the ocean water as well a part of the
kenetic energie of an astriod or komet impact being tranformed into
heat will be more as enough to do the job. This
would have given up to 500 meters of rain onto Europe and China, and
as much as up to 50 meters of rain for the rest of the world.
|
|
This
is how the world looked like according the people living at 2'000
BC, and the catholic chuch up to 1400, and this part is indeed not
very big, and could have been flooded by exessive rain, like the
stories do tell us.
The Inca indians do
also have stories about flooding due to excessive rain, who
according to them did not reach the mountains, however the correct
details may have been lost, since they did not write anything
down, but transmitted them in the form of songs, and been brought
to Europe by the Spanish invaders.
|
|
This
image done by computer simulation, and illustrates the result of
exessive rain from 500 meters of rain on the Euraisian continent
and up to 50 meters of rain elswere.
I think that most of the
rain must have fallen the fist few days already, leaving very
little chance for survivals, besides some of them which had boats
and the ones living in mountains, we should not expect to many
survivals.
Further one should
note that the most survivals were simple and poor farmers and sheapards living
in moutains at that time usually were not able to write nor read,
and the very few survivals who could possibly write, had other
things to wurry about as writing down stories, therefore dont expect any
valuable details, then most of the stories must have been told at
a mouth to mouth bases and could be hidden in tales, songs and religion.
|
Is the loess in Europe and China a result of this?.
|
This
image illustrates the stripe of loess going from the French coast
all the way down to China.
Then original
writer, Otto H.Muck was convinced that this was the result of
volcanic ashes being carried by the exessive rain as result of the
astriod impact.
I cannot confirm
this, then I have no ressources to verify it, even then it sounds
raisonable to, and could very well be true.
Then the whole is on the same altitude level, between 40° and 50° North,
as where island of Atlantis was supposed to be.
|
|
|
|
 |